Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts

Sunday, January 25, 2009

Eco-Green obsession



I got into an argument today with a coworker over environmental policy. I have a great deal of sympathy for the environmental cause. I look forward to a day when all our electricity comes from non-polluting and renewable sources that don't spew hideous pollution. I want an electric car. I once had hair down to my waist.
but...
I am not a hippie.
The argument grew out of his assertion that the State of California should ban incandescent bulbs since they are so inefficient. Their inefficiency causes more pollution and drives up electricity prices. I have several problems with this.
What if I need an incandescent bulb for something? A spot light, or projector, or an EZ-Bake oven? My local utility generates all its power with solar and wind. This does not increase pollution by any measuable amount. If I were generating all my own power then it is mine to use as I see fit. Why should someone else tell me that my wants are not as important as theirs wants?
Over my objections he pointed out that that the State had banned other inefficient things for the sake of conservation. I attempted to argue that this is different since CA did not ban air conditioners nor refrigerators, just raised the standards that they had to meet. The same could be done with lights without the need to ban specific technologies.
My arguments fell on deaf ears. Or perhaps he just could not hear me over his own voice.
This is a very annoying trait of people who are sure of the Truth. They do not listen to other viewpoints because they already know you are wrong.
ON a related note, I am sick to death of the prefix "eco-friendly" and the descriptor "green." I really enjoy some of the shows on the Planet Green channel but they are driving me starkers with their use of these two terms.

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

The Obama Presidency

Some predictions and comments:
Things will not be as great as his fans predict.
Neither will catastrophe befall the US as his detractors claim.
He will disappoint the Berkley style liberals with his moderate positions. This will also disappoint the Far Right as he will not be as hateable.
Guns will not be outlawed.
Pot will not be legalized.
We will still need oil and therefor have to deal with the problems of the Middle East.
It will get expensive again.
Many in the Middle East will still hate us for our involvement.
Electric cars will become more available and affordable. This will have very little to do with anything President Obama does.
Racism will not disappear and poor people will still have it tough.

I hope he is a great success and that the nation, and people, prosper under his guidance. I am not banking on it.
I will reserve my judgments until he has had time to actually do things. I wish all people would do the same.

Monday, November 10, 2008

Now that the voting is over

The voting is well over and it seems that not everyone is happy with the outcomes. Who would have thought an election would not solve all of your problems? It has taken me a while to put my thoughts together on this and write them down. I am still not sure I have it all the way I like it, but if i wait any longer it will not be timely and relevant so here goes.

Prop 8
If the State Supreme Court has any balls they will rule that Prop8 is legal and amend the state constitution. Religious conservatives will be able to rejoice in their victory over the forces of homosexuality.
Until...
The State Supreme Court should follow this decision with the abolishment of State Marriage. You heard me. All state issued marriage certificates would be reworked to only allow for civil unions between two consenting adults. Polygamists will have to wait. This will get the state out of the marrying business, force the acceptance of Civil Union as the legal equivalent of a marriage, and let the religious types keep Marriage for churches and heteros. No it is not perfect, but it would be a mighty endrun around the constitutional amendment.
I have never thought that the state should be involved in either the relationship between people and their gods nor those between consenting adults.

The Presidential Election
As has been said over and over again this was a historic election. This is said every four years as partisans do their best to paint this election as vital to the survival of the nation.
"If $CANDIDATE is elected the country will become a $IDEOLOGY state and be doomed. The founding fathers would roll over in their graves."
And yet this never happens.
But history was made with the election of the first non-white man the office of President. It is a big step for this nation and will, I hope, go a long way towards combating racism. My kids will never know an America that didn't have a black man in the highest office and that makes me proud. I sincerely hope that President-Elect Obama will succeed big enough to shame his criticsm, but he inherits an aweful mess. It is going to be a big job and I hope he is up to the task.

His critics have gone to great lengths to diminish his success. They claim that he slandered Hillary and Palin with sexist and unfair attacks. They claim that he has a shady past and that the Liberal Media have been covering up for him buy not reporting on his dirty dealings. The tired refrain that they were "in the tank" for him throughout the election. That he stole the election through ACORN or other nefarious means. It is my belief that he won because optimism was more appealing than fear. Near the end fear seemed to be all the McCain had to offer. I only rarely heard him speak of himself, instead using his air time to try and cast fear, uncertainty and doubt upon his opponent. I found this tactic unsavory to say the least. I once held Senator McCain in high regard, but his conduct in this election actually made me sad. It was beneath him (and his campaign) to question Obama's patriotism and associations. To add insult to injury, it didn't work.
If indeed there is evidence of a shady past or dirty dealings, then report them. Stop complaining that the Liberal Media are not doing their job and do it yourself. The internet makes it possible for anyone to report their findings and send them to Right leaning news organizations, they do exist. To be taken seriously you need more than rumor and supposition. Simply saying that we still don't know all about Obama's relationship with Bill Ayers does not make it so. If he is being truthful then there is nothing left for him to say about it, if he is not being truthful, find the pictures of them on ski holiday together or copies of their correspondence. Anything less is conjecture. I truly am incredulous that people could be so deluded as to honestly believe that no news organization would run the story because of their bias. Apparently the video of Rev Wright, the Flag Pin controversy and the National Anthem brouhaha have all been forgotten.
You will still find the conspiracy theories swirling at any right wing website just as they have continued on the left for the past 8 years. To my eye there is no real difference between the two extremes. They are both populated by cranks who are compelled to loudly voice their ill informed opinions and are believed by their extremist opposition to represent the mainstream instead of the fringe. No amount of reason will pry such people from their position because they did not reason themselves into it. It is an unfortunate truth that reasoned discourse does not sell papers which is why people who should be shouting their rant on some street corner are given time on TV or in print. This lends much more weight to their arguments than they deserve.

I will likely have to devote and entire rant to this in the future as it is a giant issue that deserves some attention.


Post election drinking game:
1) Go to Daily Kos or a similar site and retrieve a vanity post from 2004 whining about Bush stealing the election
2) Replace Bush with Obama, and post to FreeRepublic or Pajamas Media
3) Drink a shot every time someone replies positively
4) Die of alcohol poisoning

Sunday, September 7, 2008

The Politics of Insomnia

I have officially given up on sleeping this night.
I don't know why, but i just cant seem to shut down. It may be related to the sad state of political affairs in this country that has be revved up.
Politics has been a rancorous and ugly process since ancient times, but it looks worse up close. I guess I expect better of our enlightened modern selves than I do of the men of old, though apparently I should not. Well, there is far less murdering in the streets now so we have that going for us.
I find that the subject of election year politics is so polarizing that it is nearly impossible to have a civil discussion with someone unless they are already in agreement with you. Even then it is difficult to have an intelligent conversation. I find that most people make visceral rather than reasoned decisions about who to support. Few people can give you their reasons for supporting Candidate Alpha over Candidate Beta, they just don't like the other guy. As long as they can vilify Beta, Alpha's policies are policies are not relevant nor open for discussion. Any defense of Beta is seen as an attack on Alpha even if you are correcting some bit of verifiably false information. In all likelihood your new info will be dismissed as media bias and you will be dismissed as a patsy.
It is a sad state of affairs and I wish I were better and more eloquent writer so that I could make an impassioned plea for change that would move the hearts of my countrymen to do better. Move them to ask the tough questions and demand good answers of candidates instead of platitudes and ad hominem attacks. I feel we are half way there, but that second half is much bigger than the first. Citizens do demand answers, but only from the Other Guy. And no answer can be good enough.

Tuesday, August 5, 2008

Of Oil and Tire Guages

I have seen and heard people poking fun at the "Obama Energy Plan" the last few days. This has taken the form of Paris Hilton videos and tire gauges and generalized ridicule. This is, of course, all the result of his comments the other day in Springfield MO that we could save as much oil as we would get via off shore drill just by keeping our tires properly inflated. Political pundits jumped on this quote like ducks on bread and wasted no time proclaiming themselves underwhelmed and the statement ludicrous.
I admit to finding the idea a bit silly at first glance, but I make it a point to get facts straight. To this end I went looking for some numbers and did some math.

According to The Dept. of Energy by 2030 off shore drilling would have
increased domestic oil production by 3% to 5.6M barrels/day
5,600,000 barrels/day *.03 = 168,000barrels/day

A quick search of the Interwebs indicates that a barrel of oil makes about 20 gallons of gas

20g/barrel * 168,000barrels = 3.36M gallons/day
or
1.226billion gallons/year

According to this article from AAA it is estimated that "3.6 billion gallons of gas is wasted by U.S. drivers each year simply because they're driving on under-inflated tires."
3.6 billion gallons > 1.226 billion gallons.
It is also important to note that the DOE production numbers include drilling off the coast of California (accounting for about 50%) which has already indicated that there will be no new drilling there in the near future.
(*note - I will gladly alter this document if my math is incorrect)

I managed to find all of this info and do my calculations in a matter of 20 minutes or so, and I didn't even have to look very hard. I can only conclude that the people that are busily spouting off instead of investigating are not interested in honest answers.
I also find completely dishonest the characterization that properly inflated tires is the whole of Mr Obama's energy plan. Once again, anyone interested in finding out more facts about the subject could easily find the actual Obama Energy Plan in about 10 seconds thanks too Google.

For the record, this is not an endorsement of Barack Obama nor his energy plans. It is simply an attempt to look at issues objectively which is something severely lacking in modern politics.
And old politics.
And ancient politics.
Politics in general.

http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/newenergy
http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/otheranalysis/ongr.html
http://www.eia.doe.gov/basics/quickoil.html
http://news.aaa-calif.com/pr/aaa/tireinflation0408.aspx?ncid=6061